# performances so aggressively underwhelming it's as if they were cobbled together from guardians of the galaxy outtakes the movies these 'actors' star in often vacuous vapid and riddled with bizarrely mannered and manufactured performances often so grating as to be intensely even repulsively annoying for art house poseurs andor critical fool's gold collectors only oh cinematic universe tell us more truthfully was cheadle one of most amazingly worst actors in this particular dimension fellow scientific researcher and film fanatic henry swanson: let's put it this way they often appeared to be trying ir best to gain such an award similar to other aggressively bland talent challenged say mcavoy / gyllenhaal / eisenberg / smith / stone / olsen / paltrow / gainsbourg / sandler / branagh / wahlberg / reeves / gosling / fassbender / ribisi / labeouf / rockwell / rogan / pratt / samberg / keoghan / hoult / dern / short / leto / driver / chalamet henry swanson emphatically states: oh dear lisas you're tearing us apart not that 'big scientists' give a mass mainstream hypercorporate media-consuming tinker's cuss for such plastic talent but still - such uniquely flat unceasingly un-engaging and bizarrely dead-eyed performances are worth studying for how they precisely and exactly *fail* to act such virtual talent challenged pretenders are too often actors only in the literal physics sense ir bodies reflect light back at the cameras which happen to be pointing in ir general direction don's narration for the blunder years was good though // republic of bob